Coordinated by

The pre-existing tool safeTbox ( has been extended to support interoperation with the ResilBlockly tool for combined safety and security analysis.


Describe the innovation content of the result:
A safety and security co-engineering approach is made possible by importing architecture and security analysis results into safeTbox.
Who will be the customer?
Research and industry safety and/or security analysts responsible for assurance of systems which feature both concerns e.g. ICT in critical infrastructure.
What benefit will it bring to the customers?
Linking causal analysis for safety with results from security analyses (e.g. CWE, CVE) and modeling system effects.
When is the expected date of achievement in the project (Mth/yr)?
The methodology was described in D6.4 (12/2021) and technical implementation for UC1 was finalized by 07/2021.
When is the time to market (Mth/yr)?
SafeTbox is already commercially available. The BIECO results will be reviewed and integrated after project completion.
What are the costs to be incurred after the project and before exploitation?
Unclear; relatively small development overhead expected for integration, but additional costs for QA may be incurred.
What is the approximate price range of this result/price of licences?
SafeTbox is available for trial freely. Purchased licenses are available for IESE customers on negotiation.
What are the market size in Millions € for this result and relevant trend?
Unclear; depends on project contracts negotiated involving the use of SafeTbox, which can significantly vary.
How will this result rank against competing products in terms of price/performance?
SafeTbox is marketed as a research tool, and is not positioned to compete with other commercial tools.
Who are the competitors for this result?
To name some characteristic examples, Isograph Reliability Workbench, Ansys Medini Analyze, and ThreatGet.
How fast and in what ways will the competition respond to this result?
2 years or less, depending on expertise level with Enterprise Architect add-in development.
Who are the partners involved in the result?
Who are the industrial partners interested in the result (partners, sponsors, etc.)?
Have you protected or will you protect this result? How? When?
SafeTbox is copyrighted by Fraunhofer IESE.

Other results


This exploitation result consists in cybersecurity consultancy services supported by ResilBlockly (former Blockly4SoS), a Model-Driven Engineering tool that has been developed in the context of BIECO.

Security evaluation methodology

Security evaluation methodology to evaluate the security of an ICT system. The methodology is based on standards such as ISO 31000 standard for Risk Management, the ISO 29119 standard for Security Testing or the MUD standard…

Monitoring Tool

The monitoring tool is an infrastructure in charge of setting up and managing a monitoring component. It is based on event messages and enables the collection of complex events.

Extended MUD file

The extended Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) file is an extension of the MUD Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standard…

BIECO Project

SUBSCRIBE and become part of the BIECO community!

We don’t spam!

Share This